Hi Julia, thank you for your contribution to this case by sharing personal opinions or moments of interacting with Jens Soering.
What I don't get is...you had been one of the first person with access to his personal legal files which content is spreaded now around the world filling blogs and documentaries - but you didn't take your time to read it. Correct?
The only thing I can advise you seriously if you're interest to emphasize or form your very own and intimate opinion about the case, is to read both trial transscripts yourself and starting from there.
Articles from Hammel or Wright aren't nutral and their articles are not done in a scientific manner, which mean starting with a thesis, collecting all available facts as pro and cons. Establishing a correct conclusion (which also can end up in a tendency). Both go in line 99.9999% with both verdicts, which means you have to defend the correctness of the verdicts and only all what might support it!!! They don't put it in question!
According to the 2-perp theory you have to be openminded according what both have said? e.g.
- time of leaving DC
- time of arriving LC
- time of staying in LC
- time of leaving LC
- time of arriving in DC and so on
So everybody should realize from that what you will find at the crime scene will take more time than 45 minutes if you are a single killer.
The statements of both of returning to DC is the time after the movie RHP has ended. Well that is a statement by two liars. Is it plausible or not? and so on and so on....
Hi Doc! Thanks for your thoughts. I did not have access to his trial transcript at the time; I had arranged to pick up the boxes which purportedly had his whole trial transcript, but it turned out it was only a small portion of them. This was years ago and it had not been digitized yet, as far as I know, anyway.
I am finishing reading his trial transcript and the Wright Report, so perhaps I will have more thoughts later. Then I can address your other points.
Hi Julia, thank you for your contribution to this case by sharing personal opinions or moments of interacting with Jens Soering.
What I don't get is...you had been one of the first person with access to his personal legal files which content is spreaded now around the world filling blogs and documentaries - but you didn't take your time to read it. Correct?
The only thing I can advise you seriously if you're interest to emphasize or form your very own and intimate opinion about the case, is to read both trial transscripts yourself and starting from there.
Articles from Hammel or Wright aren't nutral and their articles are not done in a scientific manner, which mean starting with a thesis, collecting all available facts as pro and cons. Establishing a correct conclusion (which also can end up in a tendency). Both go in line 99.9999% with both verdicts, which means you have to defend the correctness of the verdicts and only all what might support it!!! They don't put it in question!
According to the 2-perp theory you have to be openminded according what both have said? e.g.
- time of leaving DC
- time of arriving LC
- time of staying in LC
- time of leaving LC
- time of arriving in DC and so on
So everybody should realize from that what you will find at the crime scene will take more time than 45 minutes if you are a single killer.
The statements of both of returning to DC is the time after the movie RHP has ended. Well that is a statement by two liars. Is it plausible or not? and so on and so on....
Hi Doc! Thanks for your thoughts. I did not have access to his trial transcript at the time; I had arranged to pick up the boxes which purportedly had his whole trial transcript, but it turned out it was only a small portion of them. This was years ago and it had not been digitized yet, as far as I know, anyway.
I am finishing reading his trial transcript and the Wright Report, so perhaps I will have more thoughts later. Then I can address your other points.
Thanks again!
Julia